← All sources View original paper →
The effects of intermittent or continuous energy restriction on weight loss and metabolic disease risk markers: a randomized trial in young overweight women
Six-month randomised trial (n=107 premenopausal women): ~25% energy restriction delivered as intermittent energy restriction (~2710 kJ/day for 2 days/week) versus continuous daily restriction produced similar mean weight loss (−6.4 kg vs −5.6 kg; between-group P=0.4) but modestly greater reductions in fasting insulin and HOMA-IR with intermittent restriction (between-group P=0.04).
Design
- Population: 107 premenopausal women with overweight/obesity (BMI ~30.6 kg/m²)
- Arms: IER (~25% total energy deficit as ~2710 kJ/day on 2 days/week) vs CER (~25% deficit spread across 7 days/week; ~6276 kJ/day deficit)
- Duration: 6 months
Weight and metabolic headline (LOCF; abstract)
- Weight change: −6.4 kg (95% CI −7.9 to −4.8) IER vs −5.6 kg (95% CI −6.9 to −4.4) CER — P = 0.4 for between-group difference
- Fasting insulin: between-group difference −1.2 µU/mL (95% CI −1.4 to −1.0; P = 0.04)
- HOMA insulin resistance: between-group difference −1.2 µU·mmol⁻¹·L⁻¹ (95% CI −1.5 to −1.0; P = 0.04)
- Other risk markers: abstract reports parallel improvements in leptin, hs-CRP, lipids, and BP across arms
Evidence hygiene
- 2-day/week severe restriction template—not identical to 16:8 TRE or 5:2 branded apps; place next to
time-restricted-eatingandintermittent-fastingumbrella reviews already linked.
Publication
Harvie MN, Pegington M, Mattson MP, et al. Int J Obes (Lond). 2011 May;35(5):714-27. PMID 20921964.
Outcomes
- Body Fat MassSix-month LOCF mean weight change −6.4 kg (95% CI −7.9 to −4.8) with intermittent energy restriction versus −5.6 kg (95% CI −6.9 to −4.4) with continuous restriction; between-group P=0.4 (Harvie et al. 2011).
- Fasting InsulinBetween-group difference in fasting insulin −1.2 µU/mL (95% CI −1.4 to −1.0) favouring intermittent versus continuous energy restriction (P=0.04; Harvie et al. 2011).
- HOMA-IR (Insulin Resistance)Between-group difference in HOMA insulin resistance −1.2 µU·mmol⁻¹·L⁻¹ (95% CI −1.5 to −1.0) favouring intermittent versus continuous energy restriction (P=0.04; Harvie et al. 2011).