← All sources View original paper →
A systematic review and meta-analysis of yoga for low back pain
Meta-analysis of 10 RCTs (n=967) in chronic low back pain: strong evidence for short-term pain reduction (SMD −0.48) and back-specific disability (SMD −0.59) versus control; long-term pain SMD −0.33; yoga not linked to serious adverse events in included trials.
Design
- Systematic review + meta-analysis; 10 RCTs, n = 967 patients with chronic low back pain
- Comparator: various inactive / usual-care controls (yoga styles and session counts vary by trial)
Outcomes vs control (abstract)
- Pain short-term: SMD −0.48 (95% CI −0.65 to −0.31; P < 0.01)
- Back-specific disability short-term: SMD −0.59 (95% CI −0.87 to −0.30; P < 0.01)
- Global improvement: RR 3.27 (95% CI 1.89–5.66; P < 0.01)
- Pain long-term: SMD −0.33 (95% CI −0.59 to −0.07; P = 0.01)
- Back-specific disability long-term: SMD −0.35 (95% CI −0.55 to −0.15; P < 0.01)
- HRQoL: no significant short- or long-term pooled signal in abstract
- Safety: no serious adverse events attributed to yoga in included trials
Evidence hygiene
Effects are largest vs educational / passive comparators; uncertainty increases vs exercise active controls—read primary tables before marketing “yoga cures back pain.”
Publication
Cramer H, Lauche R, Haller H, Dobos G. Clin J Pain. 2013 May;29(5):450-460. PMID 23246998.
Outcomes
- Effect Size (Cohen's d / SMD)-0.48d (Cohen's d)
- Effect Size (Cohen's d / SMD)-0.59d (Cohen's d)